A Level Psychology OCR Practice Exam

What was noted about the scenarios presented in the Piliavin study in relation to the public perception?

1. They were overly complex for bystanders

2. They clearly displayed an apparent need for assistance

3. They involved hypothetical situations

4. They lacked realism and context

The correct answer is: They clearly displayed an apparent need for assistance

The correct answer highlights that the scenarios presented in the Piliavin study clearly displayed an apparent need for assistance. This was significant because one of Piliavin's key findings was the impact of the perceived need on bystanders' willingness to help. The situations involved a person appearing to be in distress, which directly influenced whether individuals in the vicinity felt compelled to intervene. This clarity of need allowed researchers to effectively measure reactions and responses, providing valuable insights into the dynamics of helping behavior in emergency situations. The emphasis on how clearly the need for assistance was presented is crucial since it relates to the real-world applicability of the findings. If bystanders can easily recognize when help is needed, it may increase the likelihood that they will respond, a phenomenon known as the "bystander effect." The clarity of the scenario played a significant role in understanding this behavior. Other options do not accurately reflect the essence of the study. For instance, the scenarios were not overly complex; rather, they were designed to elicit straightforward reactions. Additionally, the scenarios were based on real situations rather than hypothetical ones. Finally, the realism and context were deliberately crafted to represent actual emergencies, contributing to more authentic results regarding human behavior in crisis situations.